| 000 | 02777nam a2200361 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | vtls000079128 | ||
| 003 | MTX | ||
| 008 | 160715 001 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | _a1849463859 | ||
| 020 | _a9781849463850 | ||
| 020 | _a9781782252443 | ||
| 039 | 9 |
_a201607151140 _bstaff _c201607151132 _dstaff _y201605041224 _zadmin |
|
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 099 | _aEbook | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_ade Visser, Maartje.. _9115378 |
|
| 245 |
_aConstitutional review in Europe : _ba comparative analysis/ _h[electronic resource] / _cMaartje de Visser. |
||
| 260 |
_bHart Publishing Ltd., _c2013. |
||
| 300 | _a528 p. | ||
| 505 | 0 |
_gChapter, Lesson, Part _tIntroduction. |
|
| 505 | 0 |
_gChapter, Lesson, Part _tChapter 1: The Role of Non-Judicial Actors in Upholding the Constitution. |
|
| 505 | 0 |
_gChapter, Lesson, Part _tChapter 2: The Rise of Constitutional Adjudication. |
|
| 505 | 0 |
_gChapter, Lesson, Part _tChapter 3: Purposes of Constitutional Adjudication and Access to Constitutional Courts. |
|
| 505 | 0 |
_gChapter, Lesson, Part _tChapter 4: The Constitutional Bench. |
|
| 505 | 0 |
_gChapter, Lesson, Part _tChapter 5: Identifying the Sources of Standards for Constitutional Review. |
|
| 505 | 0 |
_gChapter, Lesson, Part _tChapter 6: Testing and Remedying Unconstitutionality. |
|
| 505 | 0 |
_gChapter, Lesson, Part _tChapter 7: Interplay between Constitutional Courts and Other Actors. |
|
| 505 | 0 | _aCover, Title,Constitutional review in Europe : a comparative analysis--Preface, Introduction, TOC,Acknowledgements--Preface, Introduction, TOC,Contents--Preface, Introduction, TOC,Table of Cases--Preface, Introduction, TOC,Table of European Treaties and European Legal Instruments--Preface, Introduction, TOC,Table of Statutes--References, Appendix, Index,Bibliography--References, Appendix, Index,Index. | |
| 520 | _a[Auto Generated] Introduction In Marbury v Madison ,one of the most famous decisions handed down by the United States Supreme Court ,Chief Justice Marshall characterised the US constitution as the ‘fundamental and paramount law of the nation ’.1 Today ,his description is accepted as a truism ,not just in the United States but also in the European legal tradition .2 Constitutions are considered the supreme ‘law of the land ’because they enable government ,set out its powers ,duties and responsibilities and provide for limitations ,typically in the form of a catalogue of individual rights .Further ,constitutions have symbolic or political value .They can be seen as ‘bearers of particular conceptions of national identity ’.3 ‘A constitution is a nation ’s autobiography ... | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_aConstitutional & Administrative Law _9115361 |
|
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttp://portal.igpublish.com/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000855.html |
| 942 | _c10 | ||
| 999 |
_c75692 _d75692 |
||